DEWATERING · CIVIL AND EARTHWORK · FIXED BY STEP 04

The Geotech Set Your Price and Never Signed It

You priced pumps, fuel, and rental days against a gallons-per-minute number pulled from borings somebody else paid for, and the subsurface came in wetter.

WHY IT'S A DEWATERING PROBLEM

Other trades price quantities they can measure on a drawing. You price a subsurface behavior somebody else modeled, and the variance between the model and the site conditions falls entirely into fuel and rental, the two lines almost no one reviews weekly. By the time the overrun is visible in the monthly financials, the pumps have already run the extra days.

WHAT IT COSTS

The size of it

Flow materially above the modeled rate turns a profitable lump sum into a loss with no contractual recovery, and it registers as fuel and rental days rather than as a change order anyone will read.

OVERHEAD AT $1M–$5M
14%
Derived from Excavation, the nearest comparable trade. CFOS target 13%.
GROSS MARGIN AT $1M–$5M
21%
Derived from Excavation, the nearest comparable trade. CFOS target 23.5%.
NET PROFIT AT $1M–$5M
7%
Derived from Excavation, the nearest comparable trade. CFOS target 10.5%.

Your commodity exposure here is diesel and pumping duration. The lump sum was built against an assumed gallons per minute and an assumed run length, both taken from a geotech report you didn't commission and can't cross-examine. If flow comes in above the model and the drawdown target doesn't change, you add pumps and burn fuel and rental days for no more money. HDPE header and discharge pipe is resin-priced, so that moves on you too. Specs commonly say nothing about who owns a groundwater condition worse than assumed, and escalation or flow-rate qualification language rarely survives a subcontract review.

WHAT TO DO

Three moves, in order

STEP 01
Write the assumption into the proposal in plain numbers: gallons per minute, pump count, and run length, citing the boring log and report date you priced from. That single sentence is what converts a wetter hole into a conversation.
STEP 02
Meter measured flow and log fuel weekly against the modeled rate on every active job. The first week metered flow runs above the model is your notice event, not the month you close the job.
STEP 03
Back-test every closed job: modeled GPM and duration against recorded pump-days, fuel, and rental. Feed the delta into your next bid as a contingency you can point at and defend.
QUESTIONS

What dewatering owners ask

Who pays when dewatering flow is higher than the geotech report assumed?

You priced pumps, fuel, and rental days against a gallons-per-minute number pulled from borings somebody else paid for, and the subsurface came in wetter.

What does it cost?

Flow materially above the modeled rate turns a profitable lump sum into a loss with no contractual recovery, and it registers as fuel and rental days rather than as a change order anyone will read.

What do I do first?

Write the assumption into the proposal in plain numbers: gallons per minute, pump count, and run length, citing the boring log and report date you priced from. That single sentence is what converts a wetter hole into a conversation.

What are dewatering contractors supposed to be making?

No survey separates dewatering, so there is no figure of its own. The nearest comparable trade in the reference is Excavation, which runs 21% gross margin, 14% overhead and 7% net profit before taxes at $1M–$5M, with a CFOS target of 10.5% net. Those are derived figures, not dewatering's own. Read them as the neighbourhood, and read your own job costing as the answer.

Which part of the system fixes it?

The step is number 04, estimating system. The estimate maps one to one onto the job cost codes, so variance means something the day it appears. It comes from chapter 4 of CONTROL: The Construction Financial Operating System.

OR HAVE IT HANDLED

Everything on this page is something you can install yourself, andCONTROL is the order to do it in. If you would rather buy the finished result, SPM The Construction CFO does this work for dewatering contractors as a service. It is a separate firm, Sulphur Prairie Management, LLC, run by the same author.

What SPM The Construction CFO does, and what it costs

AUTHOR
Josh Luebker
JOSH LUEBKER
MASTER ELECTRICIAN · 150+ PROJECTS · $2.1B+ MANAGED

Wrote CONTROL, the 8 step system behind these figures. More about the author.

8 Steps 60 Days

CONTROL is the full system, written for commercial subcontractors from under $1M to $100M. It's out now. 8 steps, 6 working templates, and the order they install in. $9.99 ebook, $24.99 paperback.