Landscape and irrigation
The 2 landscape and irrigation trades, compared on the three numbers that decide whether the year works.
Landscape and irrigation covers 2 trades. At $1M–$5M they run 22% to 22% gross margin, carry 15% to 15% overhead, and keep 7% to 7% net profit before taxes. Landscaping and Irrigation publish the same 7% net profit before taxes at $1M–$5M, which is what the reference resolves to for this group.
Every landscape and irrigation trade at $1M–$5M
| Trade | Overhead | Gross margin | Net profit | Net profit target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landscaping | 15% | 22% | 7% | 10% |
| Irrigation | 15% | 22% | 7% | 10% |
- 2024 Construction Financial Benchmarker, Executive Summary, Construction Financial Management Association, 2024. The survey puts gross profit margin at 21.8%, SG&A at 11.8%, and net income before taxes at 6.3% across all respondents. The best-in-class top quartile reaches 11.9% net income before taxes. Those figures are the whole-population reading, so a single trade can sit well either side of them.
- 2025 Performance Benchmarks, Construction Companies, Jones Maresca and Company, 2025. This study reports specialty contractor gross margin between 15% and 25%. It puts net profit at 5% to 8% for a well managed company, and total indirect cost between 8% and 15%. The indirect cost band is the one worth reading twice, because it's the number most owners have never calculated for their own shop.
- SPM Trade Benchmark Reference, Sulphur Prairie Operations LLC, 2026. The reference holds 48 trades, each publishing a row of its own across all 7 revenue bands, and net profit in it is stated before taxes.
How these figures were built. Gross margin and overhead come from CFMA's 2024 and 2025 financial survey data, plus a January 2026 specialty trade study. Net profit comes from a 48 trade master dataset that covers 24 served trades and 24 adjacent trades. The reference holds 48 trades and every one of them publishes a row of its own. Where the survey and the master disagree on net profit, the master carries it. Benchmarks are reviewed against each new CFMA survey release and reconciled before publication.
Which bands are measured. The first 3 bands sit inside the range the published surveys report, and across all 48 trades gross margin there averages 22.1% against the 21.8% CFMA publishes for all respondents. The 4 bands above $10M–$25M carry the same curve further out, where the all trade average reaches 30.3%. Those 4 have not been reconciled against the licensed CFMA Benchmarker, so every export labels them as modeled and this page says so before you use them.
Compare against the rest
Find your numbers gets you to a single trade and revenue band in two clicks, or open all 48 trades.
What owners ask
What gross margin do landscape and irrigation contractors run?
Across the 2 trades in this group, gross margin runs 22% to 22% at $1M–$5M, averaging 22%. The all-trade average is 22.1%.
Which trade in landscape and irrigation keeps the most?
Landscaping and Irrigation all publish 7% before taxes at $1M–$5M, so nothing in the reference separates them on net profit. The difference between two companies in these trades is the company, not the trade.
Why does overhead differ inside one group?
In this group it doesn't. All 2 trades carry 15% at $1M–$5M, because they run the same equipment intensity and the same crew shape. Across other groups it's equipment, crew size, and how much of the work is self-performed that move the number, more than revenue does.
Does landscape and irrigation get better as revenue grows?
Overhead does. Every trade in this group sheds overhead points as it moves up the 7 revenue bands, because the indirect cost base grows in steps while revenue grows continuously.
What is the CFOS target for this group?
Overhead recalculates at every band, one point leaner than the trade average. Gross margin and net profit show the published $1M–$5M figure. Open any trade page in this group to see all three side by side.
