The month payroll nearly didn't clear
You moved money on a Thursday night and told nobody. It's happened more than once.
A payroll near miss starts weeks earlier, usually in receivables or billing. Sometimes the cause goes further back, into how the job was bid. By the time the bank balance shows it, that cause is weeks old, and treating the week itself as the problem leaves the cause in place.
Three moves, in order
Step 07: Monthly cadence
Weekly bookkeeping, cost to complete, and one CEO report, on the same days every month.
Other problems step 07 solves
Other things that go wrong
What owners ask
Construction payroll cash flow problem?
You moved money on a Thursday night and told nobody. It's happened more than once. A payroll near miss starts weeks earlier, usually in receivables or billing. Sometimes the cause goes further back, into how the job was bid. By the time the bank balance shows it, that cause is weeks old, and treating the week itself as the problem leaves the cause in place.
Which part of the system fixes this?
The step is number 07, monthly cadence. Weekly bookkeeping, cost to complete, and one CEO report, on the same days every month. It's drawn from chapter 7 of CONTROL: The Construction Financial Operating System.
Is this normal for my trade?
Across the 48 trades in the benchmark reference, net profit at $1M–$5M averages 7% before taxes. If you're well under that and this page describes your month, the two are usually the same story. The published average tells you where the pack sits, and your own job costing tells you where you sit, which is the number that pays payroll.
Where do I start?
Trace the near miss back to its cause, starting with billing dates and collection speed, then checking whether the job itself lost money.
Can I fix this without touching anything else?
You can try, and it doesn't hold. Step 07 depends on step 03, overhead calculation and step 04, estimating system and step 05, software and bookkeeping alignment and step 06, project management. Install it ahead of those and it produces numbers nobody trusts, which is worse than the problem you started with.
